wewbull

joined 1 year ago
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 32 points 1 week ago (6 children)

As a senior developer I have no idea how I'd get an AI to autonomously keep a small subsystem maintained. If I was replacing junior developers, that's what it has to do.

Everybody in my team gets to own something. What you own depends on your capability. You learn by doing. No dogsbodies doing busy work.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 7 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Honestly SO fuelled the rise of the cut and paste developer. I won't be that sad to see the end of it, and the LLMs that scraped it soon after.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 10 points 1 week ago

"New ChatGPT with Ads!

Giving you that Google feeling once again. "

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

Armies on paid personal generating content?

I see absolutely no problem with that.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 33 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Just wait until there's no stack overflow to scrape.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

I think it comes down to how it's used.

An LLM model is nothing unless it's used to process some other things. It does something. It predicts the likeliness of words following a sequence of other words. It has no other purpose. It can't take the model, analyse it in a different way and extract different conclusions. It is singular in function. It is a program.

Data has no function. It is just data.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago

Is Maxine code "code"? And I don't mean assembler, I mean the binary stream read by the processor.

I'd say yes. People have programmed it. It's where the verb "to code" comes from.

These models are no different. They are binary streams that encode a function, a program, into a form that can be interpreted by a machine. Yes, a computer generated the code, but that's nothing new.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago (7 children)

AI isn't code

Yes it is. It defines a function from input to output. It's not x86 or Arm code. It's code that runs on a different type of machine. It's a type of code that you may not be able to read, but it's still code.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not sure there is. The whole point of these anti-cheat systems is to detect running on modified setups that allow for the injection of code. An emulator is one such system.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk -1 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Is 20% faster than intel a step up, generation on generation?

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago

Lots of other new cars have lane keeping assist and automatic braking, BLIS, adaptive cruise control etc, and so on with more capable sensors and can for the most part drive without input from the driver better than the Tesla

Self driving is a huge step on from these things though. Hyper cruise control is easy in comparison and that's what those features give.

Self driving means capable in all situations and all conditions. Not just highways.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 39 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Anti-cheat "compatibility" means allowing software kernel level access and after Crowd strike I think that tide will be turning even on Windows.

Anti-cheat will change. Not Linux IMHO.

view more: ‹ prev next ›