wewbull

No. The have nag screens for donations, but they don't block on principle.

Biggest button needs to be "Disable lane keeping assist" and that should sort most of the stress he refers to.

I think you're underestimating how badly it taught them. I see a lot of developers (when interviewing) that are unable to reason about code.

Lot's of people learn how to cook by following recipes, but they don't try to get work in catering or running restaurants. That requires a different level of understanding.

SO was the coding recipe book. It was fine for hobbyists. Not professionals.

As a senior developer I have no idea how I'd get an AI to autonomously keep a small subsystem maintained. If I was replacing junior developers, that's what it has to do.

Everybody in my team gets to own something. What you own depends on your capability. You learn by doing. No dogsbodies doing busy work.

Honestly SO fuelled the rise of the cut and paste developer. I won't be that sad to see the end of it, and the LLMs that scraped it soon after.

"New ChatGPT with Ads!

Giving you that Google feeling once again. "

Armies on paid personal generating content?

I see absolutely no problem with that.

Just wait until there's no stack overflow to scrape.

I think it comes down to how it's used.

An LLM model is nothing unless it's used to process some other things. It does something. It predicts the likeliness of words following a sequence of other words. It has no other purpose. It can't take the model, analyse it in a different way and extract different conclusions. It is singular in function. It is a program.

Data has no function. It is just data.

Is Maxine code "code"? And I don't mean assembler, I mean the binary stream read by the processor.

I'd say yes. People have programmed it. It's where the verb "to code" comes from.

These models are no different. They are binary streams that encode a function, a program, into a form that can be interpreted by a machine. Yes, a computer generated the code, but that's nothing new.

AI isn't code

Yes it is. It defines a function from input to output. It's not x86 or Arm code. It's code that runs on a different type of machine. It's a type of code that you may not be able to read, but it's still code.

I'm not sure there is. The whole point of these anti-cheat systems is to detect running on modified setups that allow for the injection of code. An emulator is one such system.