wewbull

joined 1 year ago
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The scale is the difference and who is harmed.

Billion dollar company losing $100. Who cares?!

Billion dollar company stealing from all artists in the world. We care.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago

Points 2 and 3. Basically make restrictions on normal user accounts which are fine for humans but that will make bots swear and curse.

Unless you mean "what should the registration process be" I think API keys via a user account would do.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago

...but if they don't know I expect them to say so. An LLM isn't trustworthy until it says "I don't know".

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 5 points 2 months ago

Exactly the reason I suggest it.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 17 points 2 months ago (12 children)

An LLMs "intent" is always to give you a plausible response even if it doesn't have the "knowledge". The same behaviour in a human would be classed as lying IMHO.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 71 points 2 months ago (5 children)
  1. Make bot accounts a separate type of account so legitimate bots don't appear as users. These can't vote, are filtered out of post counts and users can be presented with more filtering option for them. Bot accounts are clearly marked.

  2. Heavily rate limit any API that enables posting to a normal user account.

  3. Make having a bot on a human user account bannable offence and enforce it strongly.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Agreed, It wouldn't be a good thing. However it's their own failures and mismanagement that are causing it.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 16 points 2 months ago

It's certainly arguable that the algorithm constitutes an editorial process and so that opens them up to libel laws and to liability.

Fair point.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Stupid sharks loose their teeth, not their fins that actually do the work.

Errr...wat?!?!

The shark dies either way.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 37 points 2 months ago (12 children)

Under what law?

UK currently holds the people that post things liable for their own words. X, the platform, just relays what is said. Same as Lemmy. Same as Mastodon.

If you ban X I don't see why those other platforms wouldn't be next.

Now should people/organisations/companies leave X? Absolutely! Evacuate like it's a house of fire. Should it be shut down by legal means? No.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Screen 0 deleted because of no matching config section.

Your XOrg conf ig has got hard definitions of your devices which aren't matching what is being detected. Probably best to let auto detection do it's thing.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 0 points 2 months ago

Arch people tell you "I use arch BTW"

Rust people make PRs rewriting your code in rust.

Rust people are worse.

view more: ‹ prev next ›