whydudothatdrcrane

Ah the statistical significance, which as everybody knows is assessed ...visually? Mic drop

BTW I have another comment here, totally irrelevant to this discussion, that I bring up statistical siGnifiCAnsE as an example of confident falsehood. Thanks for proving me right lol

Edit: here it is for context ( from https://lemmy.ml/post/17638298/12096466 )

Layman statistics is not the hill I would die on. Otherwise (being guilty of the fallacy myself) I now think that making a subject mandatory school lesson will only make people more confidently incorrect about it, so this is another hill I won’t die on for probability and statistics. See for instance the widespread erroneous layman use of “statistical significance” (like “your sample of partners is not statistical significant”) you see it is a lost cause. They misinterpret it because they were taught it. Also professionals have been taught it and mess it up more than regularly to the point we can’t trust studies or sth any more. So the solution you suggest is teach more of it? Sounds a bit like the war on drugs.

because the happiness view doesn’t start at 0

How is that so?

Hmm, point taken.

Um, is it the one though that transphobes focus on because of their obvious fear of emasculation?

Wait what, you mean all of my memes are incomprehensible? There was one unfortunate meme I thoroughly explained, but people heavily downvote me still lol

Oh snap he was banned. I had the perfect comeback, I will save it for another instance.

Go suck your mo and find out sister

His fragile masculinity might be a social and personal pathology though.

There is no need for vaginoplasty. Women with dicks are also valid. Now the longer you take this up with me the worst for your health, so gtfo sicko.

Yeah sure, flat earther

This would explain the downvotes lol