wurosh

joined 3 years ago
[–] wurosh@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago

The Internationale begins playing in the background

[–] wurosh@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 months ago

The kakoune editor cimes with clippy by default. It's not exactly a Vim version though, but close enough.

[–] wurosh@lemmy.ml 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why is 50% the target?

[–] wurosh@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

Android is Linux. It's all the stuff on top that makes it more secure - 90% of which is covered by flatpak + MAC.

[–] wurosh@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

Yes, but I've had it across multiple sites that play video, so I don't think it's youtube.

[–] wurosh@lemmy.ml 15 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Just make sure you put in a stop-loss order

[–] wurosh@lemmy.ml 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

You keep telling the next investor it'll be profitable soon. I believe the guy that came up with this scheme first went to prison or something, but afterwards we all collectively decided we were cool with it.

[–] wurosh@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The man's talking about class differences in general though. Pretty sure those predate us apes even knowing there were other different colored troops.

Either way it kind of feels like a bit of a chicken and egg discussion. Were we hierarchical animals first, then leveraged arbitrary and irrelevant traits to enforce that hierarchy, or vice versa.

To me it's really simple. You adress class issues -> you adress "culture war" issues (those disproportionally impacted get disproportionately addressed, as they should be). You address "culture war" issues -> shitshow ensues.

I know what I'm gonna focus on.

[–] wurosh@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

Did he actually recommend one? That said, it's obvious the author favors Marginalia personally, but there's no point pretending they don't have biases. At least for me, making them obvious helps.

[–] wurosh@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Idk, doing this "properly" would take an immense amount of effort and manpower. This feels more like a "let me get enough info for an educated guess" EDA process, which still seems to have taken a lot of effort and I appreciate it a lot.

[–] wurosh@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

No one is arguing any of the points above. But to quote the Wikipedia article:

While many developments failed to live up to initial lofty promises, most of them eventually became occupied when given enough time.[6][16]

Citation 16 is a Bloomberg article from 2 years ago in case you're wondering.

Put yourself in my shoes, I can't exactly propose edits to that statement based on a single youtube video of a ghost town existing.

Your conclusion ("How could they? ") does not follow from your premises, much as I agree with them.

[–] wurosh@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

I'm starting to believe this is a bad faith argument. Do you have anything addressing the specific point of ghost cities actually (not) being populated now?

For those that are too lazy to read:

  • link 1: 39 buildings demolished for illegal construction
  • link 2: 50 second clip of 7 buildings that were never finished being demolished (no context, other than the buildings being there for some years)
  • link 3: luxury mansion development stalls due to missmangement/lack of funding, leaving people that paid for those homes without a property
view more: next ›