I think the events on the ground will be what dictates things ultimately. Russia is wining the war, and even western media is starting to grudgingly admit it. The west is basically tapped out in terms of material support, and Ukraine is running out of manpower to keep the war going. Eventually, it's either gonna be NATO boots on the ground or Russia dictating terms. And the former almost certainly means a nuclear holocaust.
That's the big question of our times.
How to say you're historically illiterate without saying so. Go read up on how USSR was formed clown.
My expectation is that Ukraine is going to be dumped after the election regardless of who wins. The whole gig has run its course at this point, and there's a new war with Iran being drummed up already.
Never ask a dronie how gullible they are, they'll tell you.
All NATO wanted to do was to use Ukraine as a tool to weaken Russia, and now NATO will discard Ukraine like a used condom. That's the fate of all the vassals of the empire.
I love how you dronies always project. The only ones who are mad are you lot. We just think you provide free entertainment like court jesters.
By Russian instance you mean one where people engage with reality that's uncomfortable for the utterly brainwashed people like yourself?
Seems to me that you're the one justifying genocide of people of Donbas by the fascists that took power in a violent coup backed by the west. Even western media reported on the far right problem in Ukraine and the ethnic cleansing in Donbas before the war started.
Zelensky took office on the promise of normalizing relations with Donbas and Russia, and then proceeded to do the opposite. Also, wonder what happened in 2014 that might've provoked a response from Russia there.
Moyers: Bilbo said, “One drop of Negro blood placed in the veins of the purest Caucasian destroys the inventive genius of his mind and palsies his creative faculty.” Is it true that the Nazis thought the one-drop rule too extreme?
Whitman: They did indeed. They never proposed anything nearly as extreme as the one-drop rule. In fact the standard, the most far-reaching Nazi definitions of who counted as a Jew, matched the least far-reaching ones to be found in the American states. Virtually all American definitions of who counted as a black were far more draconian than anything found in any Nazi proposal. At the same time, the Nazi literature expressed real discomfort about the so-called one-drop rule, which, I have to say, was not found in every American state, as there were a variety of approaches in the US. But it was understandably notorious. The Nazis, difficult as it is to imagine, described the one-drop rule as inhuman, as “involving human hardness that’s going much, much too far, you couldn’t do that kind of thing,” they said. And their own definitions for who counted as a Jew, especially those that were ultimately attached to the Nuremberg Laws, were more restricted than anything to be found in American states at the time.
Yeah, best they could do because the famine was happening all over USSR. In fact, as anybody who's not an utter imbecile would know, famines were already prevalent during tsarist times and were one of the major causes for the revolution. Pretty clear who's the miserable loser here. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.