zbyte64

Do we assume everything read in a textbook is correct? When we get feedback on drawing, do we accept the feedback as always correct and applicable? We filter and groom data for the AI so it doesn't need to learn these things.

They were probably talking about white phosphorus: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/10/lebanon-evidence-of-israels-unlawful-use-of-white-phosphorus-in-southern-lebanon-as-cross-border-hostilities-escalate/

I was narrowly taking issue with the comparison to how humans learn, I really don't care about copyrights.

I can go look at some Monets and paint some shitty water lillies, is that somehow problematic?

If we're using your paintings as training data for a Monet copy, then it could be.

Are we even talking about AI if we're saying data quality doesn't matter?

I don't understand how when I say "agency" or "an aspect of the process" one would think I'm talking about the volume of information and not the quality.

I'm literally saying (an aspect of) process matters, how are we saying the same thing?

Then I guess my original point of agency being an essential element in human learning had nothing to do with your conversation about how AI learns like humans. Carry on.

I bring up agency and I get an exemplary response what I mean.

Raising a child well requires someone who is able to engage in the child's own theory of mind. If you just treat a child as an information sponge they will need more therapy than usual. A good parent takes interest in their child's ability to exercise agency.

Hello fellow human. I also learn by having information shoveled to me without regard to my agency.

As a business you can be a maverick against many laws, just not the laws regarding finance.

That Nazi propaganda spreading user? Elon Musk.

If we're talking about corporations I can only assume you mean options in how to get fucked.