technology develops exponentially, while humans are … static
I have yet to see a self-improving technology that does not require adaptive human intelligence as an input.
technology develops exponentially, while humans are … static
I have yet to see a self-improving technology that does not require adaptive human intelligence as an input.
Compilers are deterministic and you can reason about how they came to their results, and because of that they are useful.
I don't use corporate social media anymore, is Facebook actually taking on misinformation now?
First day of job training is to keep the one machine running that keeps the place from exploding.
Happy? I'll settle for dignity.
Them goalposts is me asking for the original receipt. Show me the Biden supporter who you claim this flag represents.
Then show me the Biden supporter (who isn't protesting) that wants small government like those who fly the Gadsden flag.
Speaking of books, have you ever read the Earthsea series? The way you talk about things reminds me of how in Earthsea things have a true name by which you can call and have them send towards your will. The trick is that some people have more then one true name and that, I think, is metaphor for how we can escape being manipulated when someone (or AI) learns our nature.
We don’t see black empowerment in China or a pride parade in Iran.
Sir, this is a Wendy's.
DEI requirements is not nepotism, but let's take on the core issue I think you brought up: meritocracy. If you show me two people with the same level of skill and experience, I would say the one that came from the most disadvantaged environment is more qualified because they were able to get to the same level with less support.
But you brought in numbers, let me do the same. L Consider that the minority group you mentioned actually has greater barriers to participate, so those 10 people might actually perform better than 80% of the 1000 of the majority group. Assuming both groups have the same distribution of merit is a fallacy.
That's a distinction without a difference. The code is useful because we can reason how it was made and we can then make deterministic changes. Try using a compiler that gives you a qualitatively different result each time it runs even though the inputs are the same.