The board doesn't "let go" of people willing to do a hatchet job, they hire them into their other companies to do the same. "Failing upwards" is a term that comes to mind.
zbyte64
joined 1 year ago
They are going to regret this?
A company doesn't remember, and the people who are actually responsible don't have regrets cuz the other option was to hand over control to someone else (hopefully more qualified).
That's not how you sell fish though. You gotta emphasize how at one time we were all basically fish and if you buy my fish for long enough, those fish will eventually evolve hands to climb!
Adding the benchmark back into the training process doesn't mean you get an LLM the can weed out irrelevant data, what you get is an LLM that can pass the new metric and you have to design a new metric with different semantic patterns to actually know if it's "eliminating red herrings".
If they know about this then they aren't thinking of the security implications
Misses says my T-shirt tan ruins the look, not the dad bod ❤️
Talk about making a difficult problem (self-driving) more difficult to solve by solving another hard problem.
Being Liberal is not the same as being an American Libertarian. The latter thinks tax is theft and has diverse views on whether children should be regarded as property under the law.
"Gold age of humanity"? Dude we are asking for dignity, not some fully automated luxury gay communism. I mean all that sounds nice, but it starts with valuing people over profits.
Grim, but technically accurate, to say nothing of whether such actions are right or wrong.
I'm stealing this.
The point is they don't get fired for laying off staff.