this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
973 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
4225 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aluminium@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yep I found out myself pretty quickly. With a simple App which was maybe 10K lines of code I started targeting Android 10 and so far every new major version caused some issue with the code as Google constantly messes around with files, permissions, ...

I can't imagine what a task it is to maintain a game.

[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 26 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I just wish Google would release some kind of 32-bit Android 4.4 sandboxed compatibility layer for old games. Android 4.4 was the standard Android version for a super long time for a zillion devices, and I'd bet 99% of the dead .APK games out there would run on that version.

Give me a tool with a crapload of slow, clumsy emulation wrappers covered in tedious config options and a launcher any time I want to run an app through this compatibility layer and let me play Amazing Alex again.

edit: it occurs to me I basically want an Android emulator for Android. Or like, a psuedo-emulator that's not really an emulator like WINE/Proton.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

and let me play Amazing Alex again.

Why not just buy a top notch 4.4 phone off eBay? Looks like you can get a Galaxy Note 4 for about 40$

[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ahh, you know, it's about the convenience of not having to juggle another device. I still have an old Galaxy Tab kicking around the house that plays all that stuff pretty well, but it's not the same as being able to pull it out of my pocket on the bus.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ya know, I actually had the idea a while back to run an android emulator on one of my servers and then setup remote access to it with some software that hopefully had an android client app.

The idea being I would use the android remote client on my actual phone to use a "phone in the cloud", ofc my original intentions for it wouldn't have been affected too terribly by things like latency, but for games it may or may not work all that well (I never really got past the sketch out phase lol)

[–] pirat@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why not try emulating it locally on your phone instead of a remote server, to eliminate the latency? Was it not possible at the time you got the idea?

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I thought about it, but the pros didn't outweigh the cons for me. The biggest con being limited resources on a phone and a remote server would have relatively endless resources, and my use case could handle a little latency so the biggest pro wasn't so big

[–] moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago

There exists stuff like this.

Virtualxposed. Sandvxposed.

The most popular one I heard about vmos, https://www.vmos.com/

But that one was android 8 (I think?) closed source, and probably spyware inside and outside the thing.

Also, new changes by google may break these emulator type apps:

https://www.reddit.com/r/SamsungDex/comments/16r1tg8/phantom_process_killer_solution_in_android_14/