this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
469 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
4225 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm an unfortunate captive of the oligopoly of the internet industry in the USA. In many places, you have 2-3 choices of internet, and all of them suck ass. I'm in this situation. All internet providers in my area have a 1-1.5 terabyte data cap. So when I download Call of Duty for 250 gb and it fails and has to update or reinstall, I've wasted 500 gb, and have now reached 50% of my data cap in just 1 day. There are crazy fees, for example, Cox Cable says:

If you go over, we’ll automatically add 50 gigabytes of data for $10 to your next bill. That's enough for about 15 hours of streaming HD video. If you use that 50 gigabytes, we automatically add another 50 gigabytes for $10 and so on until you reach our $100 limit of data overage charges or until your next usage cycle begins.

So your $90 a month internet can easily become $190 a month, which is fuckin criminal, like that is so scummy and asinine how that can even be legal. But it is perfectly legal. The FCC is also looking into these data caps but now that we have a new anti-federal government president elect... This is probably toast.... Nothing will change now that most federal agencies are about to be deleted.

From a technology standpoint too, nothing is really getting better

Comcast is still using Coax instead of Fiber Optic and desperately trying to convince people that somehow, someway coax can be just as good. Do with that info what you will, I have no opinions on it. There was a Federal program started recently to expand rural internet access, which will probably be gutted in 2025 leaving many without suitable internet again. Fiber Optic is fast, but still, not new technology, and doesn't solve a critical issue.... It doesn't matter if you have 2 Gigabit internet if no one in the world is uploading even half that fast. A single download on Steam is like 450 Mbps, Epic Games launcher is horrifically slow. I get like 120 Mbps max when downloading Fortnite updates even with 1500 Mbps internet hard wired to my router with top tier hardware

It's just sad to think about the future of internet in the USA, and knowing we'll be imprisoned by these data caps for the foreseeable future.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dan@upvote.au 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Comcast is still using Coax instead of Fiber Optic and desperately trying to convince people that somehow, someway coax can be just as good.

Comcast are starting to offer 2Gbps symmetric (same speed up and down) via DOCSIS 4.0 in some areas.

[–] blakemiller@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yep. It’s pretty nuts how much they can push over copper. And remember that just having a coax cable at your house doesn’t mean it’s copper the whole way back to the ISP.

[–] dan@upvote.au 5 points 1 week ago

You're right - upstream connections are usually fiber. In fact there's a name for this type of network: HFC (hybrid fiber + coax)

[–] Buttflapper@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is it on coax or fiber? And do you still share that bandwidth with your neighbors?

[–] dan@upvote.au 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The 2Gbps symmetric though Comcast is still cable. In theory, DOCSIS 4.0 supports up to 10Gbps down and 6Gbps up over cable, although real-world speeds are always lower than theoretical speeds.

You share bandwidth with your neighbours regardless of whether it's coax or fiber. A common contention ratio for residential connections is between 40:1 and 50:1, meaning the bandwidth is shared between 40 and 50 people (i.e. 1Gbps of upstream bandwidth per 40-50 people with a 1Gbps connection). This is usually fine as it's very unlikely that every customer will be using the full bandwidth at the same time. Residential usage is usually very spiky with only brief periods of high speed usage.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What about FTTH ?

I have a direct line from the DSLAM (?) to my apparent.

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The bandwidth is still shared... It'd be prohibitively expensive to have dedicated bandwidth just for your connection, and most customers don't need anywhere near that. Unlimited, dedicated 1Gbps is around 320TB of data per month.

A business-grade connection has fewer people sharing it, but it's still shared. The only fully-dedicated connections are enterprise-grade connections (like in a data center), and even then it's an upgrade that costs quite a bit. :)

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well it isn't shared before the upstream server, that's what FTTH is.

I'm seriosly interested in information supporting your claims, not because they are wrong (of course we share at a certain level, that's the whole idea of the internet itself is) but because they are quite vague.

BTW for 40€ I get 10Gb/s symmetrical. I'm not in the US.

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Well it isn't shared before the upstream server, that's what FTTH is.

FTTH just means that there's fiber going into your house.

Most residential fiber internet connections use a technology called PON (GPON for gigabit or XGS-PON for 10Gbps). My understanding is that the fiber from your house goes into a splitter box in the street, which takes fiber connections from many customers (usually either 32 or 64 customers) and multiplexes them into a single fiber by either using different wavelengths of light or by time multiplexing. Upstream from this, bandwidth is shared.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Upstream from this is the internet, so it's no longer shared (it goes wherever it wants to and it is the servers that are "shared" by users). So there might be a bottleneck in the "splitter box" but that's it.

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 1 week ago

Upstream is usually still your ISP's network for a while longer. The splitter box goes into some other equipment owned by your ISP.