this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
612 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

61203 readers
4541 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's the worst way to do solar, though. It doesn't get to take advantage of economies of scale in installation and inverters. Some levelized cost of energy studies put it just as expensive as nuclear.

Solar gets its cheapness when it's in fields or on top of large, flat commercial/industrial buildings.

[–] mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do commercial/industrial buildings not require power then?

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 2 months ago

There's often enough space on those buildings for excess power. Not all those buildings have particularly intensive energy needs. Many are just warehouses.