this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
127 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
2936 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't matter, that's not what we are talking about here. You don't have to use a face of a real child.

Oh, you wanted to pretend it is? Cheating doesn't work with me.

Despite your shit attitude, AI nudification is, in fact, what we are talking about. It's what the OP article is about. Actual children were exploited and harmed.

You have decided to change the subject to "what if the child porn is 100% synthetic?", which is a different thing than what everyone else has been talking about, but is fucked up just the same.

When confronted with the near universal attitude that CSAM is morally reprehensible, you have decided to lash out in anger and act like nobody knows what you're talking about.

Don't worry, we get it. You make fucked up pedo shit with Stable Diffusion on your gaming PC, and you get scared every time you see the very real consequences. You think you can change our minds about it by talking down to us, as if being against child pornography was a remotely controversial take.

And you are downplaying the very real crime against very real children the OP article describes because you are compelled to defend your own disgusting habit.

Seek help, and don't fucking look at child porn. You're doing irreparable damage to yourself. There are resources available to you: https://troubled-desire.com/

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm actually interested in dark grey eyed blondes just a bit taller than me, and dark hazel-eyed brunettes just a bit lower that me, and none of them have been much younger.

But thanks for confirming that you can't argue without calling your opponent a pedo.

And even more that you really can't comprehend that someone would argue hard in defense of someone else.

How can one be such a miserable creature is beyond me.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm actually interested in dark grey eyed blondes just a bit taller than me, and dark hazel-eyed brunettes just a bit lower that me, and none of them have been much younger.

That's a suspicious amount of information you're offering up to deflect that we can all see you defending child porn.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

we can all see you defending child porn.

that's also my words:

And even more that you really can’t comprehend that someone would argue hard in defense of someone else.

your arguments are trash, so fool blocked