this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
375 points (95.6% liked)

Not The Onion

12438 readers
810 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good question. I'm speaking per stream, not sure overall.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Per stream can be very misleading because if Apple pays double per stream but the song gets double the streams on Spotify the payout is exactly the same. There's an argument to be made that if you got as many streams on Apple as you do on Spotify you'd make more money but let's be real, if Apple got as many streams as Spotify their per stream price would also be closer to what Spotify pays. These companies aren't paying extra out of kindness. Their per stream pricing is higher because they know they (on average) won't get Spotify number of streams. They can undercut Spotify to make themselves look better while most likely paying out roughly as much (or maybe even less than) what Spotify pays out.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

You know, I'm generally with you there, but Tidal recently lowered the price of its Hi-Fi tier to match apple music's price while Spotify still hasn't made good on their lossless promise.

I just don't get the appeal of Spotify aside from sunk cost. The podcast spam is enough for me.