this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
135 points (77.3% liked)

Technology

59772 readers
3191 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] moormaan@lemmy.ca 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm not surprised, but this finding would not have crossed my mind.

[โ€“] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yeah, what they're calling AI can't create, they're still just chatbots.

They get "trained" by humans telling them if what they responded was good or bad.

If the humans tell the AI birds aren't real, it's going to tell humans later that birds aren't real. And it'll label everything that disagrees as misinformation or propaganda by the CIA.

Tell an AI that 2+2= banana, and the same thing will happen.

So if conservatives tell it what to say, you'll get an AI that agrees with them.

It's actual a topical concern with musk wanting an AI and likely crowdsourcing trainers for free off Twitter. When every decent human being has left Twitter. If he's able to stick around trumps government long enough and grift the funds to fast track it...

This is a legitimate concern.

As always it's projection, when musk tweeted:

Imagine an all-powerful woke AI

Like it was a bad thing, he was already seeing dollar signs from government contracts to make one based on what Twitter thinks.