this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
64 points (95.7% liked)

Games

16858 readers
1004 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I had suggested the GamePass style subscription thing for Steam years ago. This is one thing someone else actually does that Steam does not. I'll just use both. Because gaming is one of my only hobbies, I play a lot. The subscription model access to an entire catalogue is more economical than buying every single new game for full price. And if I do want to buy them, they're still usually sold on Steam too.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I have to say, PC version of Game Pass is far more cheaper than their console edition, so it's can be worth it for sure. But I definitely agree you need to game a lot for it to do so,

I had PC game pass as part of my game pass ultimate to your subscription that I got with my Series X, and honestly despite their diverse catalog that they had, I found most of the games that they offered I either already had because they had gone on sales or already given for free through other services(epic or Humble choice usually), or just didn't interest me.

I love how many Indie style games that they would but, it was very rarely that they actually offered a game that was interesting despite the fact that they cycle through their content constantly. And their AAA titles, at least at that time not sure if it still is the case was definitely lacking in the availability department. It was very clear that the primary focus point of Game Pass was Indie style titles over the primary Studios, but I never really wanted to play them due to the fact that since they're cycled out so frequently I would start a game and then two or three weeks later I would get a message saying this game is leaving Game Pass.

Plus it also was hard for me to swallow spending $240 for a subscription to Ultimate yearly(or whatever the pc gamepass sub price is yearly) , and then having nothing to show for it when that subscription ran out because you lose access to all the games. I would much rather spend that money on actual games and then not lose access to it when it's done.

Honestly, I found Humble Choice being a good alternative to paying that sub, roughly 120-140 a year, and you get 8 titles a month that's yours to keep

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But you don't get every single new game with GamePass, either. You get a mediocre set of stuff published by Microsoft with some occasional AA games and a random selection of indies, some of which are actually good, but also aren't that expensive to just buy and own instead.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Most AAA games with even a tangential relation with Microsoft get released on Game Pass on day 1

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That means stuff they publish. Which, despite all their acquisitions, is consistently very mediocre. And because of the day one "free" status, almost always has bad extra monetization on top of it.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I really think you're underestimating how much and what kind of content they offer, but you do you.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's an incredibly far cry from the "all" he mentioned, and it isn't close to the best or most desirable.

I'm well aware of what it has available, and it's genuinely not good enough to get me to install Windows if they provided it for free. But the entire reason Gamepass exists is because they know it makes them more long term than buying your games.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The subscription model access to an entire catalogue is more economical than buying every single new game for full price.

This is what I said. I never implied they had all games. Only that it's cheaper in the long run to subscribe and get access to the new games on GamePass than paying full price for each one.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

every single new game

Their catalogue is dogshit and has a very small selection of games that are even worth considering on a steep discount.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I can literally say the same about Steam with how much shovelware it contains vs how many games that aren't garbage. I've found many enjoyable games on GamePass just as I have with Steam. Sucks that you haven't, I guess. 🤷🏻‍♂️

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's not the ratio.

Gamepass's entire library of "not dogshit", cumulatively, isn't worth a year of the subscription to actually own. They don't publish a meaningful number of games worth playing if they were free, and you can count the indie games (which are cheap to actually own anyways) that are actually good on your hands.