this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
836 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59772 readers
3191 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It's Open source hardware too

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Whilst that's a nice slogan, in Electronics "open source" doesn't mean anywhere as much as it does in Software because it's generally just knowing which components go into the circuit, which is but a fraction of the work (laying out the board is a massive chunk of work, in some cases most of it, and at high enough clock speeds circuit design is an art in itself).

Mind you, I like the Orange Pi and Banana Pi guys, and the idea of an SBC designed for being an open source router is pretty appealing, though nowadays maybe pfSense would be a better choice than OpenWrt.

Finally this thing having only 2 ethernet ports + WiFi makes it little more than a regular $70+ SBC board + a box - something easy enough to put together by any technically inclined person - which isn't exactly exciting.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 5 points 2 days ago

Open hardware (by oshwa definition) would include the board layout

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

pfSense would be a better choice than OpenWrt

I heard pfSense had a hard time with wireless radios, and that's where OpenWrt shines comparably. Is that not true?

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Yes, FreeBSD doesn't handle many wireless cards. Same applies to OPNsense, my preferred version.