this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
836 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59772 readers
3115 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It doesn't matter. Port configuration can switch around and the bottleneck is still there. Traffic with in the broadcast domain (i.e. subnet) will handled by the switch alone.

There is WiFi onboard so it can have some actual benefits, depending on design and how user access resources, but how likely you're going to saturate that 1/2.5G link? Not even you stream some 4K movies from Plex to iPhone will does that.

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think you might have missed the point: with a managed switch that 2.5Gb port can be used to handle multiple WAN and LAN connections simultaenously. My home network includes two WANs and six LANs split purely by VLAN tagging and that 2.5Gb connection should handle all of them just fine.

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Which I do specified "in the broadcast domain". Sure you can use it with VLAN but that more than the scenario I'm describing.