this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
49 points (90.2% liked)

Games

16912 readers
366 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
49
Marvel Rivals dev on why Rivals succeeded and Concord failed - "it didn't bring any unique value" (www.videogamer.com)
submitted 1 week ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
29 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

  1. It's free

  2. The gameplay is good.

  3. The characters are designed well

If Concord had done two of those things, it would have been fine instead they'd didn't even do one of them...

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Free" wouldn't have saved Concord. They had basically no interest in the game from the time it was revealed, and the open beta player numbers supported that. Putting a price tag on the game was an attempt to bleed out less profusely.

[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah concord was"free" during open beta and lost users. It was just unappealing all around

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I heard the gameplay wasn't awful, it just wasn't stellar either.

I got as far as seeing it on a store shelf, going "Huh, I didn't hear about this one..." (Googles) "Live Service!" - "Right then, I'm out!"

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I got as far as seeing it on a store shelf

It's on shelves?

Most paid games don't have a physical release because it adds costs these days, it's surprising they have physical copies.

Is it just a free disc that tells the hardware to download it? Or some kind of collector's edition with extra stuff?

But give it a try, quick play is quick play and you won't get a good team comp, but I got to silver in ranked and people know what they're doing most of the time. You won't always get two tanks, but two heals and a tank is the worst I've seen.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It WAS! For like a week! LOL.

Edit for clarity Concord was in stores.