this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2024
164 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

75460 readers
2664 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 68 points 9 months ago (10 children)

This doesn't even sound like a scam though.

He bought some tokens at low price, waited for the price to go up, sold them and that made the price drop. Oh well. Sounds like a normal goal, buy low, sell high.

As part of their revenge campaign, crypto traders continued to buy into Gen Z Quant, driving the coin’s price far higher than the level at which Biesk’s son had cashed out. At its peak, around 3 am PT the following morning, the coin had a theoretical total value of $72 million; the tokens the teenager had initially held were worth more than $3 million. Even now, the trading frenzy has died down, and they continue to be valued at twice the amount he received.

So... basically just some people got mad because they were acting too quickly with no thinking involved, and others were still able to earn on it after that.

If I understand that right, this whole thing is just "I stupidly put my money into your son's untrustworthy currency and lost money. It's all his fault!"

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

At the point where the tokens were supposedly worth $3,000,000, the liquidity could probably only support actual sales of like $3.

[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago
load more comments (8 replies)