this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2024
164 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

76252 readers
2810 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 68 points 10 months ago (2 children)

This doesn't even sound like a scam though.

He bought some tokens at low price, waited for the price to go up, sold them and that made the price drop. Oh well. Sounds like a normal goal, buy low, sell high.

As part of their revenge campaign, crypto traders continued to buy into Gen Z Quant, driving the coin’s price far higher than the level at which Biesk’s son had cashed out. At its peak, around 3 am PT the following morning, the coin had a theoretical total value of $72 million; the tokens the teenager had initially held were worth more than $3 million. Even now, the trading frenzy has died down, and they continue to be valued at twice the amount he received.

So... basically just some people got mad because they were acting too quickly with no thinking involved, and others were still able to earn on it after that.

If I understand that right, this whole thing is just "I stupidly put my money into your son's untrustworthy currency and lost money. It's all his fault!"

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

At the point where the tokens were supposedly worth $3,000,000, the liquidity could probably only support actual sales of like $3.

[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

paper profits

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 46 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm on the side of the scammers at this point.

There's been so many meme coin pump and dumps that there's no excuse for not knowing what to expect.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They should be teaching kids how to do this in grade school so they don't fall for it in high school. Too bad they gotta pay for computer science classes...

[–] iconic_admin@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Earns? A strange turn of phrase for a con.

[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

He did more labor for that 50k than someone like Musk did for their next 50k

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Where's the con part? Did he guarantee they'd go up or something?

[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

when you buy from yourself instead of from a different market participant that is considered wash trading and it is fraud

[–] captainastronaut@seattlelunarsociety.org 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A fool and his money… you know. Anybody who is buying fake money with real money deserves what they get.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

What's the difference between "real" and fake money? State control?