this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
250 points (93.1% liked)

Not The Onion

12525 readers
797 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
250
DELETED (www.foxbusiness.com)
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by ptz@dubvee.org to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world
 

Edit: Fuck some of these comments Y'all sick in the head. I'm out.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

LDS Mormons aren't Arian, they are tritheist.

Mormonism as well contains additional overriding scripture, like how Islam has the Qur'an in comparison with Christianity or how Christianity has the New Testament in comparison with old Judaism. Which seems make them separate religions, as all of these extra scriptures make the faiths significantly different from each other.

All of these religions have God as the centrepoint (although LDS Mormonism could be less so due to it being polytheist)

Yes, Mormonism puts a focus on a character called Jesus who's somewhat based on Jesus of Nazareth which Islam also does, but there's also a sect of Hinduism which does the same. Is this Christianity, too?

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Okay, I think at some point we're talking past each other more than to each other. You are clearly much more invested than I am in the relative truth claims, categorization, and internal consistency of various bronze-age mythologies and their propagandized descendants.

You're drawing bright lines in places that I don't find particularly interesting as a non-believer more interested in secular history than apologetic theology. Still, I suspect the bright lines are very important in that context. If you would like to claim this one as a win, please feel free. Have a lovely weekend!

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 4 days ago

Fair, one does not "win" an argument on the internet 🤣