this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
697 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59963 readers
3330 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I cannot possibly say but what I would say is that there is a significantly higher likelihood than what he is saying is correct. Given that you basically can prove it for yourself by simply asking the AI to quote copyrighted content, the fact that it can do that rather demonstrates that copyright content was acquired illegally, and if the copyright holders never talked to openAI, then openAI by definition never got permission.

It's weird that you would assume malice on everyone's behalf by default, what would they have to gain by it?

[–] john89@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s weird that you would assume malice on everyone’s behalf by default, what would they have to gain by it?

Can you read? I never assumed malice on everyone's behavior. I said a statistically significant amount.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep and I've asked you and you've got no statistics.

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

No, I don't.

Do you?