this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
745 points (98.1% liked)

Greentext

4751 readers
1116 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 53 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is actually addressed in the books. There's a part when Harry is whining how nobody believed him when he said Voldemort was back and Hermione basically goes "Dude, you convinced Cedric to touch the cup at the same time you did, then you both disappeared and you came back with his dead body screaming about an evil wizard who has been dead for more than a decade. I only believed you because I'm your friend."

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 32 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's a huge plot point in the fifth book/film as well. Lots of people including the ministry don't want to believe him.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 34 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Yeah but the movies specifically frame it more as "the ministry has been infiltrated" and less as "Harry, your story is shady af"

[–] AEsheron@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

It's been a long time, but I very much remember it being played as the powers that be are simply afraid to acknowledge that V is back. They do attack Harry's story some to help justify keeping their heads in the sand, but that didn't seem like the point to me.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The movies also frames Dumbledore as a hard boiled unhinged detective who slams people against walls and shakes them down for information, whereas the book totally missed out on that great aspect of his personality. Swings and roundabouts

[–] colourlessidea@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

DIDYOUPUTCHANAMEINTHAGOBLETOFFIYAAAAHHH

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Definitely, Dumbledore is much better in the movies. I think the books overexplore his relationship with Voldemort and he comes off a bit daft. All of his interactions with Voldemort are like:

Voldemort: Genocide is cool, right?

Dumbledore: No, it isn't

V: You're right. Anyway, theoretically, how can I become more stronger?

D: Are you gonna do a genocide?

V: high pitched Whaaaaat...?! Naaaaaaaah! I would never do that!

D: Ok, here's how you become more powerful...

[–] colourlessidea@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Dumbledore is much better in the movies

This is a hot take I’ve never heard before

[–] tetris11@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

He's a man of ACTION in the films, and not a man of giving fools a second chance.

Dumbledore in the books has my heart, but Dumbledore in the films has my sword

[–] EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

A turd is better when you can both see and smell it rather than when you can only smell it