this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
656 points (93.0% liked)

Memes

50768 readers
726 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 24 points 5 months ago (2 children)

That's why it's important to communicate with them rather than alienating them.

[–] gravityowl@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You're talking as if for over a year (cough decades cough) Palestinian activists hadn't tried talking to the liberals about their party's unshakable support for the ongoing genocide.

What's left to say to people who are "going to pick the lesser of 2 evils" even when you showed them that their pick is still funding the ethnic cleansing of all Palestinian people?

We should talk to general leftist people. Not the liberals. They still value money and profit over people

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why? They will side with fascism over leftism every time.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That assumption isn't true. Socialists aren't born that way, most come out of the status quo ideology of liberalism. By abandoning all liberals with blanket statements, we'd simply self-fulfill that prophecy. Even US libertarian militias, a peak of liberalist ideology, have sometimes sided with antifascists over fascists (see: Redneck Revolt lines of affiliation with American Pit Vipers).

You're referencing a real trend, and there's a kernel of truth behind it, however it's harmful to the socialist movement to assume that as a universal inevitability.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

There aren't enough leftists to win with violence, so our only hope is to win with dialogue. What's your plan?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Dialogue can't change the mode of production, so we must create more leftists so revolution becomes feasible.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

agreed -- how do we make more leftists though?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. Talking. Violence isn't going to make more leftists.

That said, call me paranoid but I think three-letter organizations are the main obstacle to organizing. I don't know what to do about that.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

Revolution will be required eventually, which was the original point.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

By telling potential allies they're as bad as the enemy of course! It'll start working any day now.

The leftists have their own magical thinking and it's seems be to inherient to the movement. But unlike rightist magcial thinking, one cannot bully their way to a leftist paradise so right wins and will always win until the leftists compromise. No sign of that happening in my life time.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 months ago

I mean, liberalism and those who support the current system are bad, yes. That doesn't mean it is necessarily deiliberate, but the Capitalist and by extension Imperialist system most of us on Lemmy live in is an extreme source of cruelty and brutality worldwide.

Don't know what you mean by "magical thinking" though.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

Liberals are the enemy though.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 months ago

I disagree, so my plan is just violence