this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
579 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

71989 readers
3314 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 25 points 5 months ago (38 children)

BlueSky has some novel monetization concepts but yes, I think they will eventually find that those are not sustainable and will introduce ads eventually.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (31 children)

How hard is it to run a platform charging a couple dollars a month so that you don't need to turn into a ghoulish capitalist nightmare? Like, really. If even one of them went the "no ads, ever, just a tiny monthly fee" wouldn't that be better? Wouldn't everyone flock there? Is everyone so dumb that they think these huge sites will run for free?? No.. wait I think I've answered my own question..

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Have you met people?

Introducing even a 0.49 charge per month would flood the front page of reddit and lemmy with "enshittification" rants for days. And 9 in 10 people would leave the platform, if not more.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I should have stated it the other way round. Free and ad driven by default (like normal and like what people are used to) but an optional premium tier that removes ads and gives more control of your feed.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You would think, but seeing how people react to YouTube premium (at least on social media) I still have doubts.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That is true. Why people think enormous content servers should be run for free boggles my mind..

[–] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 months ago

I don’t think it should be run for free, but I think it’s wrong of them to erase compeition by offering a free service and than suddenly make it not free.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments (34 replies)