Technology

61203 readers

4603 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

277

Apple chips can be hacked to leak secrets from Gmail, iCloud, and more (arstechnica.com)

submitted 1 day ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 62 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Speculative execution seems to be the source of a lot of security flaws in many different CPUs. CPU manufacturers seem to be so focused on winning the performance race that security aware architecture design takes the backseat.

Also, it's more and more clear that it's a bad idea that websites can just execute arbitrary code. The JS APIs are way too powerful and complex nowadays. Maybe websites and apps should've stayed separate concepts instead of merging into "web apps".

I also wonder if it'd be possible to design a CPU so vulnerabilities like these are fixable instead of just "mitigable". Similar to how you can reprogram an FPGA. I have no clue how chip design works though, but please feel free to reply if you know more about this.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 4 points 6 hours ago

Fast for the benchmarks. "We'll make it slower and safer later."

[–] cellardoor@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Take a look at ARM Morello and CHERI.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Also, it’s more and more clear that it’s a bad idea that websites can just execute arbitrary code. The JS APIs are way too powerful and complex nowadays.

Javascript in general was a mistake, and always has been.

The web should've had Scheme or Python instead. Or better yet, we shouldn't have given up so quickly on Java Web Start because then we could've had proper web applications with their own windows and native UIs and such.

Maybe websites and apps should’ve stayed separate concepts instead of merging into “web apps”.

Damn straight!

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online -1 points 10 hours ago

Oh no, not python!

[–] Unmapped@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Being a Linux user I really like everything being ran in the browser. What if we just have more control of which JS APIs can be used? On a site by site bases. Which I assume can probably already be done with extensions.

[–] JaddedFauceet@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Some browsers such as cromite disable JIT compilation and WebAssembly by default. Allowing you to opt-in to enable these features on a site by site bases.

JIT and WebAssembly have been the source of many high profile CVE in browser recently including the one mentioned in the post (well, this one is on Safari's Chrome).

relevant research