this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
1308 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

63082 readers
3856 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DataDisrupter@feddit.nl 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I wasn't aware of that distinction about the energy for the laser to generate the heat energy within the reaction not being factored into the Q value, very interesting, thank you! Would that energy for the laser still be required in a "stable reaction" continuously, or would it be something that would "trail off"?

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Inertial confinement doesnt produce a "stable reaction" it is pulsed by it's nature, think of it in the same way as a single cylinder internal combustion engine, periodic explosions which are harnessed to do useful work. So no the laser energy is required every single time to detonate the fuel pellet.

NIF isnt really interested in fusion for power production, it's a weapons research facility that occasionally puts out puff pieces to make it seem like it has civilian applications.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Womble@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It would be more productive if you said how you think im wrong. Just saying 'youre wrong' doesnt really add anything to the discussion.

[–] BalderSion@real.lemmy.fan 5 points 1 day ago

In my experience the community will usually distinguished between "scientific Q" and "wall plug Q" when discussing fusion power gain. Scientific is simply the ratio of power in vs power out, whereas wall plug includes all the power required to support scientific Q. Obviously the difference isn't always clearly delineated or reported when talking to journalists...

[–] rowanthorpe@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

If you haven't already seen the talk recently given at the Chaos Computer Club's "Hacker Hotel" named "How Thermonuclear fusion works, free energy without waste", I highly recommend it. https://libranet.de/display/0b6b25a8-ff152736-e38872dd7aed088e