this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
306 points (80.0% liked)

Technology

63134 readers
3277 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ExFed@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Clearly this is a controversial statement. I'm team "use what's available and preference tools that get the job done quickly."

I work in several different languages. VSCode has TreeSitter and a bevy of slick plug-ins. NP++ does not. I can use VSCode on both Windows and Linux. If I've got a desktop environment, I will hands down pick VSCode over NP++ every time.

Otherwise, let's be real, NeoVim is king.

[โ€“] kava@lemmy.world 2 points 10 minutes ago* (last edited 10 minutes ago)

NP++ was good 20 years ago during a time with much weaker competition and it's been coasting on that good will ever since

It's OK for a text editor (compared to something totally basic like notepad) but other text editors have caught up in every single category

like you said, VS Code is now the default go to code editor for a lot of people. if you don't use VS Code, you use vim.

for non-coding uses, I don't see the functional difference between NP++ or something basic like Gnome's text editor