this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
570 points (98.8% liked)
Not The Onion
13719 readers
1202 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
why is andrew tate even relevant, i dont know who he is aside from he hates women
I never figured out why Paris Hilton's sex tape was relevant at the time. Before the sex tape she wasn't a public figure, or a celebrity. She was just daughter to the Hilton hotels founder. So why would anyone treat THIS sex tape like the Pam Anderson/Tommy Lee sex tape? Pam and Tommy were both celebrities BEFORE the tape was leaked. But Paris? Nobody knew who she was.
Or the same thing with the Kardashians. Nobody knew them before the sex tape. I still don't know why people would care about them.
I guess what I'm asking here, is did tate ever have a sex tape leaked where some guy came all over his face while he was sucking it off? Apperently if you leak that sex tape, even talentless hacks can become celebrities.
Although......fair play to Paris. She's actually quite smart and doesn't deserve to be labeled in the same camp as tate.