this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
69 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

64075 readers
5900 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bzdalderon@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This actually makes sense. The problem though, will be the same reason fact checkers failed; personal and institutional bias on what's considered acceptable.

Only an unbiased AI could do this well, and that's a loose statement.

[–] dermanus@lemmy.ca 11 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I don't think there's such a thing as an unbiased AI. They're all biased based on the input data.

Something like this would be inherently subjective, it's not a pure data question with a clear yes or no.

[–] CptBread@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Machine learning and LLMs isn't the only way to do AI though. (though your second point I do kinda agree with)

[–] Bzdalderon@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 hours ago

I feel like you missed my "loose statement" point