this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
1463 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

66067 readers
4820 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] takeda@lemm.ee 64 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yeah. What company wouldn't allow it?

When I was working for an ad exchange, everyone had adblock installed in their browsers, I found that quite ironic.

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 58 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I would argue it's a security issue not to have any ad blocking. Many scams online start with popups or fake ads.

So if you get the opportunity to talk to IT that's what I would mention.

[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A good IT is blocking ads at a company-level. Browser extensions wouldn’t matter, and in fact, shouldn’t be allowed for the same reason.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can only catch so much at the edge and DNS level. Browser extension catches the stragglers that get through. But we've mitigated virtually all browser induced malware possibilities by just moving to cloud-based internet isolation. It's similar to what the DoD uses, if anyone's familiar with their use case: https://www.bylight.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/CBII_2020-2025.pdf

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even with CBII ads still make the internet cancerous to even look at

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Oh for sure, but with CBII, malicious ads can't exploit a vulnerability and infect your local system.

I'm not always working in the office, and they've asked us to connect to VPN only if we need access to the internal network. Email and Teams work without VPN, but now you want me to log in for web access? A browser blocker is better imo.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

The FBI agrees with you

(Although they have since taken down their PSA woth no explanation)

[–] micka190@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah. What company wouldn’t allow it?

My IT department uninstalled it from my work laptop, and told me not to reinstall it because - and I quote: "The only browser IT officially supports is Google Chrome."

What makes this doubly stupid is that I'm a web developer. I literally can't test my stuff on another browser...

[–] shyguyblue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I used to develop ads (non intrusive things for home depot or go RVing) and i used ad blockers. When testing, i would just run private browsing with plugins disabled...