this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
143 points (91.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54669 readers
417 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 93 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Time to move to jellyfin I guess.

[–] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Can't you just hide the paid movies/tv tab? Or is it a principle thing

Is jellyfin better? I'd never heard of it 'til now

[–] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 10 months ago (4 children)

The biggest problem with Plex (I'm a user) is that you need a network connection just to use it with your local media unless you do a little research to figure out how to bypass this. Why is this a problem? You don't notice it until there's a network outage and you want to watch something. Or if the Plex servers are glitching. It's needlessly complicating the process of watching your media.

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Not really sure what you’re getting at here. I’ve had a network outage for the past 2 days and was able to watch stuff on my local NAS just fine. I haven’t done anything special to make it do that.

[–] Zectivi@sh.itjust.works 23 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I believe what they're getting at is an issue if they're not already authenticated prior to the outage. Then they'd have no access to their media unless they look into the workaround for that beforehand. It has been an issue in the past, especially when Plex's auth servers go down. I remember plenty of Reddit threads complaining about it.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

if you have to ask someone else to access your own [local] data, youre doing it wrong. ack

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 4 points 10 months ago

i wouldn’t say wrong… it’s SSO. i have multiple servers on my plex account, and i much prefer to have a single login for all of them than different for every server. it also allows things like login with plex for overseer etc

it’s a trade-off for sure, but i’d argue a very worthwhile one

perhaps you could argue that you should be able to run the auth server yourself, and sure… maybe… but i think that’s the worst of both worlds

[–] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 months ago

Yeah this is pretty much it. When it first happened to me I had no idea and just wrote it off as a glitch. Then it happened again or the Plex servers were out so everyone was talking about it. There should never be a reason for your home media server to need access beyond the local LAN.

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Ah, makes sense. Thanks.

[–] stratosfear@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 10 months ago

Ehhhhhh. I don't think anyone expects to be setting up their Plex server with an Internet outage. As long as you have been setup prior and you lose Internet you can still log in with the last local profile you used. It's not perfect but you're not locked out. No workaround (at this point in time) is necessary, assuming you've already authed and added your server to your "whatever" device.

And ultimately you just keep Kodi for the apocalypse. This complaint about "not being able to access your media" if the internet is out is misleading. Of course you can access your media if the internet is out, it just might not necessarily be with Plex which is ultimately an online service. Sure we can call it a limitation but that's just nit-picking since most everyone has their Internet up almost all the time, offline does work, and there's plenty of other ways to access your media.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

You need to specifically set it up to work offline. It's not out of the box. Either the setup guide you followed included that step, or you went out of your way to enable it, and forgot about it. It's been that way for 5+ years, at the very least.

[–] DadVolante@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, one of the reasons I love plex is I don't actually need to be connected to the internet for it to work. Just my home network. All my devices work fine when the internet goes out, which is frequently does during storm season

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No managed users then? I’ve never had them be able to use their profile when plex is down.

[–] DadVolante@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Just me.

I'm old and have very few friends, heh. Especially ones who would even know what plex is

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chup@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It's just a setting like so many other things. You can put in individual IPs you trust or IP ranges.

It seems Plex has figured out lots of Plex 'server admins' are just normal Windows users and click OK on everything w/o reading any change logs or checking any settings. So it's easier and saver to enable a lot of things right away. Admins can just go into settings and adjust it.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

Sure but if the severs are down managed users cannot login.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Could you provide a few examples or point me in the right direction to bypass the always online or call home features.

Currently my Library is shared with a reverse proxy and only accessable through CloudFlare. My firewall and pihole block my Plex server from sending anything to the Plex analytics address. Within Plex settings I have it set that Plex is not accessible online.

Is there anything else that I can do or missed.

[–] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

Here's one article that runs through it, otherwise just search for terms like "plex local network" or "plex local authentication"

https://www.howtogeek.com/303282/how-to-use-plex-media-server-without-internet-access/

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

the idea of signing up at plex is somewhat antithetical to a lot of selfhosters.. theres nothing plex is doing that cant be done for free with better software.

[–] TheOneCurly@lemmy.theonecurly.page 20 points 10 months ago (14 children)

To be fair that's a pretty recent development. Jellyfin apps for smart tvs are only just becoming stable enough for real use. Plex was the only option for a long time.

[–] jasep@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

The Jellyfin for Kodi add-on has been out for 3 years. I use the Jellyfin app for content when I'm away from home, but I use Kodi for a front end for all my home based clients. Works great.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago

There's always the software Jellyfin was forked from: Emby.

It does have a paid model to support development, but with single-purchase lifetime options instead of requiring a monthly subscription.

I've been quite happy with it for the last 7 years. Their apps are pretty stable, hardware accelerated transcoding works great, it does a great job identifying content then managing/fetching metadata, and the developers and their community are responsive and helpful.

[–] neo@lemmy.comfysnug.space 1 points 10 months ago

I would argue that they're still not, until their UIs can be easily wrangled with just a TV remote.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Jellyfin was forked from emby (emby is similar to Plex, jellyfin is open source) in 2018 when emby went closed source, and they implemented sync and remote streaming if I recall correctly.

It's a principle thing mostly. Plex just keeps ignoring features users want and trying to push some monetization model.

They regularly implement what I'd say most would consider anti features.

For example, I remember the push back on the mandatory "recommended" tab. It's the first thing you see when navigating to a library. Wow. Neat. Some bean counter at Plex is "recommending" what I should watch on my own library. No thanks.

There was also the fiasco with emailing your friends things you've been watching. Just what you want where you store all your legally owned DVDs with your legal streaming rights to your friends.

Then there was also a thing where they began collecting data on your media libraries to their servers.

There's also mandatory Internet connection if you want to have local users :). Lots of people barked at this and they ignored it and tried to spin it as an ok thing. You cannot have other people in your family have different watched status and stats without connecting to the internet. Oh did your Internet go down? So did Plex. At that point how's it different than Netflix. Not to mention we're the ones doing the hosting. It's in our network. This should not be reliant on an Internet connection.

The list goes on.

It works pretty well and I've thus far been too lazy to change, but jellyfin is open source, and doesn't have evil people behind it.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 11 points 10 months ago

I never messed with Plex but Jellyfin is pretty easy to muss with so it's definitely worth giving it go.

Jellyfin is FOSS as well, I assume Plex isn't since it's doing.......all this. lol

[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Jellyfin is great and open source. I've never tried Plex, but I've heard that Plex has apps on more platforms.

Also, I'd recommend checking out Findroid if your on Android. Its UI is native instead of the usual web interface in the official apps. Iirc iOS has a similar project.

[–] gerbler@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Plex is definitely more user friendly. I would like to try Jellyfin again but I host Plex for my parents back home and I don't want to troubleshoot Jellyfin internationally when I know they can just install Plex and log in on their devices and I don't have to deal with it.

Definitely different strokes for different folks but I understand Lemmy is very big on FOSS so it's no surprise Jellyfin has such a positive following here.

Ultimately I'm glad to have options regardless.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Steve@startrek.website 7 points 10 months ago

Its not better, but its worth it for not being dependent on internet

[–] Platform27@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Depending on your server, and how you install you might have a bad experience. I’ve had issues where it wasn’t finding the film/series metadata, having plugin issues, and being incredibly slow (slow UI when anything is being done, slow scanning folders, slow loading saved metadata, etc). Jellyfin, like a lot of open source software, feels like jank. The devs know about a lot of issues, but they’re swamped with so much, with this big of a project.

People criticise Plex, rightfully so with some of their bad decisions, but it still works better. For me, Plex runs so much better, and without issues. I won’t be moving away to Jellyfin in the foreseeable future, but I’ll be glad when I am able to.

[–] rambos@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I know plex has some features that jellyfin doesnt, but it was time few years ago, at least for me

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It's the app availability, LG TVs don't have jellyfin which is awkward for me.

[–] deluxeparrot@thelemmy.club 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There's an official Jellyfin app in the LG app store.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I may not have checked in awhile but I could have sworn that walhen I got the TV that was a con of it.

Unreal thank you.

[–] rambos@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

My TV is not even smart. I use 40$ xiaomi tv stick (android 1080p). Its powered from USB port on tv and connects via wifi. Its not the fastest device, but it works just fine Edit: not sure about price anymore, seems like its more like 50$ now, but still cheap IMO

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Chromecasts and derivatives etc. exist?

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

I can cast to my nest speakers and TV's with Chromecast built in.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Then again, with Jellyfin you don't have to pay for hardware transcoding. That is the one that really bothered me. It seems insane you'd have to pay to properly utilize your own hardware.

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

As soon as they get xbox app that's not just a fucking browser....

Sure, you might be fine, my 7 year old and wife aren't. The ui and ux are hot barbage without a mouse. I just want to use my tv remote and simple arrows and for the play/pause button to work.

I paid for plex pass because jellyfin didn't pass the usability test in our household.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Does Jellyfin have a PlexAmp equivalent?

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Yes, finamp. I have it installed. I haven't tried it.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.unicornsonlsd.finamp

I'm gonna hold off switching for as long as possible. This looks like it's not even close to PlexAmp. I mostly use artist stations and the DJ features. This just looks like it only plays albums or manual playlist.

[–] Z4rK@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

It’s coming, a redesign will hopefully hit beta very soon now.

https://github.com/jmshrv/finamp/issues/220#issuecomment-1868600157

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

It's similar in name only though. Plexamp has a lot of great features that this one is missing.