Technology

59589 readers

2962 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

388

Electric school buses are a breath of fresh air for children | Nearly $1B in federal funding could help clean up the unequal health impacts of diesel pollution. (grist.org)

submitted 10 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

121 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Electric school buses are a breath of fresh air for children | Nearly $1B in federal funding could help clean up the unequal health impacts of diesel pollution.::Nearly $1B in federal funding will help decarbonize transportation and clean up some of the unequal health impacts of diesel pollution

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Less dense than thinking that public transport can't use electric vehicles, claiming that public transport wouldn't fix diesel issues.

[–] set_secret@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

who said that? Can you even read?

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You:

Why not just make normal public transit? Like school busses aren’t a thing here so I took the regular bus to school like everyone else, it’s a lot more versatile too since people can take it to more places.

that doesn’t fix the toxic diesel pollution does it?

OP there wanted to know why school buses instead of ordinary public transport buses, separate from any diesel vs. electric issue.

You then went ahead and said "nuh-uh if we don't have dedicated school buses we can't fix diesel fumes".

That's why you got downvoted, that's why my snarky retort got upvoted. You may not have meant it like that but that's how what you wrote reads to other people.

[–] set_secret@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I never suggested we don't or do have dedicated school buses. My point is crystal clear: all diesel buses, school or otherwise, are toxic to humans. School buses are a bigger problem, directly exposing kids to these harmful particulates. It's astonishing how my simple point about electrifying public transport and or school buses, which I've repeated ad nauseam, gets twisted. People's preconceived notions or maybe their reading comprehension problems are skewing the real issue here. It's not rocket science, yet here we are, going in circles.