144
Deletion of major news channel sparks fears Telegram has given in to Kremlin pressure.
(novayagazeta.eu)
this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
144 points (95.6% liked)
Technology
68432 readers
11135 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Telegram was subordinate to the Kremlin the whole time. You have to be stupid to not realize that.
Source?
Telegram was banned in Russia for a short time and for some inexplicit reason unbanned. Russia has made no attempt since then to ban them. The founder of Durov explained that they managed to force Russia to unban them becauye they kept buyint changing IPv4 addresses to evade the ban. But everyone who knows the technology knows this is a stupid reason and completely unbelievable. IP addresses are very expensive and the connections in the app need to change to the new IP. At the rate that Russia and everyone else is able to block IPs (thousands per second) you simply cannot implement such a strategy. What Telegram is saying is dumb propaganda for the gullible.
Telegram insists on not having end-to-end encryption for default chats and group chats and profile and contact data. They use E2EE for Secret Chats but they use MTProto, which is a custom key exchange and encryption algorithm that is doing some fairly questionable stuff according to leading experts in the field. Telegram being insecure is no problem in itself. But they explicitly advertise it as being secure and private and mislead the users to believe no government can spy on them.
They are based in the UAE with their main office being empty and essentially only a mailbox. Nobody actually knows where they are.
Their servers (with unencrypted chat data) are hosted in questionable authoritarian countries all over the world. They do not have any servers in Europe or the US. This is a huge problem since nobody knows what server software they are running and your chats are not encrypted.
Somehow they have infinite funding for infinite fast cloud storage. They don't disclose any financial data. The founder always says it comes from his liquidated assets of VKontact. But that's impossible as he would have run out of money years ago already. Hosting cloud storage like they do is very very expensive.
If you want to be sure that nobody gets and uses your data use an end-to-end encrypted messenger like Signal. If it's end-to-end encrypted and open-source then no other questions need to be asked.
Thanks. I've never used or recommended Telegram since Signal appears to be the obvious answer, though at least unlike Signal they actually take ownership and publish their own app themselves to places like Flatpak and provide aarch64 builds. Been waiting for Signal to do this for... forever.
The creators are incapable of flying when thrown out windows.
Pavel Durov doesn't live in Russia, so I don't see this insinuation has to do with anything.
His family doesn't have wings either.
Borders never stopped Russia from killing someone they didn't like. Especially if it's a Russian citizen.
Durov is the world's most obvious asset lmao