this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
137 points (96.6% liked)

Games

18674 readers
215 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The point you were parroting

And again with words in my mouth. That wasn't even close to my point!

My point was that you were unnecessarily sarcastic in a rude way to someone. Beyond that, your comment made absolutely no sense because you were telling them that they were mad at the tool instead of the way the people are using the tool. Which, if you go back and read their comments, is what they were actually upset about. They didn't make much, if any comment about AI itself, but rather the way people are using it.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How was that your point? You just rephrased the original comment with some different wording.

In what universe would someone have looked at that and gone "ah, some witty commentary on how unnecessarily sarcastic my post was; furthermore, on the inconsistency between my original retort and the subjects of the previous post".

Did you just forget to write that part the first time? Do you think I can read your mind? How was this supposed to work?

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In what universe would someone have looked at that and gone...

I repeated you nearly word for word, only substituting a few words. Go ahead and look up "parody"

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

That's not the definition of parody.

I mean, I could tell you were being snarky, but definitely not that you were being snarky as some sort of performance art accusation thing.

Anyway, now we're just talking about your shortcomings as a communicator and I think we can both agree that's not an interesting conversation, so... moving on.