this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
729 points (98.0% liked)
Not The Onion
15915 readers
1453 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The youngest Millennials graduated school in about 2014 or 2015 at the latest. There's no way, in context, they're talking about a PhD, and very, very little chance they're even talking about undergrad university.
Hm...I'm seeing that millennials are between 29 and 44. Even 29 is old enough to earn a PhD.
Either way, the older ones are definitely old enough to be talking about post-secondary.
It wasn't obvious because of the age, it was obvious because people don't say "back when I was in school" to refer to a doctorate. And when the context is specifically trying to emphasise how young they were at the time, they don't tend to mean "when I was an undergrad", either.
They didn't say "back", but yeah, I get what you mean.
They heard about them. This could've been because when they lived in Texas, Texans told them about the group. Or because they studied trends in anti-vax movements when they went to school in Texas.
I think the original point was that the reader has to make assumptions about what they meant, and my point was that even clarifying the age doesn't change that we're still making an assumption about when they were in Texas.