this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
131 points (95.2% liked)

Games

38438 readers
2679 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BrightCandle@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The console market ever since the PS3 and xbox 360 has been a leech on the PC platform market. They turn up every X years apart to buy a cheap GPU and CPU on a chip and demand rock bottom prices for volume and pay for none of the research and development in the intervening years.

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I respectfully disagree. AMD basically said that they survived the Bulldozer debacle because of Sony and Microsoft ordering their APUs. The custom designs also have trickled down with AMD making iGPU that are desktop levels now (8060S).

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

If not for consoles, AMD would have likely gone bankrupt or become a marginal player.

Considering what's happening with Intel in the past ~7 year, it would have been game over for x86 PC gaming on the CPU front.

[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

But that's what they've always done. The NES used a 6502 processor that no one used anymore, and the Sega a Z80 after CP/M went the way of dinosaurs. The Xbox and PS2 used out of date Pentium processors.