JeremyHuntQW12

joined 1 week ago
[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Hey fuck this shit

[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Identification would need to be handled by a 3rd party to even remotely work. Then they pass on the “yes they’re over 16” tick to the social media platform, with no actual identity details.

The legislatiion specifically allows SM sites to handle ID.

[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I don’t see many options between asking for a birthdate and asking for ID for this problem. I don’t see any way that this can be enforced that isn’t problematic.

The senate inquiry outlined the two likely solutions :

  1. Uploading ID to the website.

  2. 3D face scanning. This will include continual monitoring so if another person comes into view they will have to face scan in. Remember, its prohibited for chidren to even watch prohibited content with their parents.

[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The law does not require users to upload government IDs as part of the verification process.

No, it merely requires the sites to provide an alternative, such as face scanning using a mobile phone unlock. Using a computer ? Then you'll have hand over your ID.

The law also explicitly gives sites the right to onsell private information if its outlined in the terms of agrrement.