this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
142 points (78.9% liked)

Technology

69941 readers
1949 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
142
Bill Gates to give away 99% of his wealth in the next 20 years (www.gatesnotes.com)
submitted 1 day ago by 1984@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world
67 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

One of the best things I read was an 1889 essay by Andrew Carnegie called The Gospel of Wealth. It makes the case that the wealthy have a responsibility to return their resources to society, a radical idea at the time that laid the groundwork for philanthropy as we know it today.

In the essay’s most famous line, Carnegie argues that “the man who dies thus rich dies disgraced.” I have spent a lot of time thinking about that quote lately. People will say a lot of things about me when I die, but I am determined that "he died rich" will not be one of them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mostNONheinous@lemmy.world -2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

So which is it then, keep the money or put it back into the world?

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

He could instead use the money to lobby for billionaires to pay 90% taxes, thus making the world a better place. But that would be giving power away, instead he gets to pick and choose what makes him look cooler at cocktail parties.

[–] mostNONheinous@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago

He could and that would be awesome, but there is a shit ton of money in his hands that can still do plenty of actual good whether we all think he is still an asshole for accumulating it. I’m not arguing for him to be remembered as a good man, but the money can create some good still.

[–] gradual@lemmings.world 0 points 3 hours ago

We can continue this discussion after you've learned how to read.