this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
621 points (98.0% liked)

Not The Onion

16214 readers
2103 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A country where the age of majority is less than 18. So they can find someone young enough for trump's liking

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Keep an eye out for Ivanka look-a-like contests

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I wish we all didn't know how true this was. But it is.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

he already has pam bondi, karoline levitt, and kristi noem. he already threw away nikki and sanders.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You mean like the vast majority of the world and all but 10 US states? Don't look up age of consent. For god's sake don't look at Western Europe.

(You meant "age of consent", not "age of majority".)

[–] albert180@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What's the problem if two teenagers have sex?

It's only that low in Europe between the same age group. If a 30 year old bangs a 14 year old, (s)he will go to prison

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nope, not in Germany. A 110 year old can legally bang a 14 year old, as long as they don't have a position of authority over the teen.

[–] albert180@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Wrong

Nach § 182 Absatz 3 StGB sind sexuelle Handlungen zwischen einer Person über 21 Jahren und einem 14- oder 15-jährigen Jugendlichen für den erwachsenen Sexualstrafpartner dann strafbar, wenn er die fehlende Fähigkeit des Jugendlichen zur sexuellen Selbstbestimmung ausnutzt. Ein solcher – zumindest versuchter – Missbrauch wird mit Freiheitsstrafe bis zu drei Jahren oder mit Geldstrafe bestraft.

Nach § 182 Absatz 1 StGB sind hingegen sexuelle Handlungen zwischen einer Person über 21 Jahren und einem 16- oder 17-jährigen Jugendlichen grundsätzlich erlaubt, soweit hierfür keine Zwangslage des Jugendlichen ausgenutzt wird. Anderenfalls wird ein solcher – zumindest versuchter – Missbrauch mit Freiheitsstrafe bis zu fünf Jahren oder mit Geldstrafe bestraft.

https://www.juraforum.de/news/ab-wann-bzw-mit-welchem-alter-duerfen-jugendliche-sex-haben_248032

wenn er die fehlende Fähigkeit des Jugendlichen zur sexuellen Selbstbestimmung ausnutzt

This paragraph is the important one. A court must first rule the teenager was not mature enough to bang an adult. Courts have ruled sexual inexperience alone is not sufficient to convict someone. The inability of a 14 year old to consent must be proven in order to convict an adult for banging a 14 year old.

[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

In Saudi Arabia you can't be legally married before 18, so that's effectively the age of consent.