kibiz0r

joined 1 year ago
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 4 points 5 days ago

Sean Murray’s curse is finally broken.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

ITT:

People throwing shade at the devs who could easily be maxing&relaxing in IT but chose to make art instead, rather than the perverse financial incentives baked into the industry which encourage them to overpromise to secure funding and then underdeliver to abide by publisher demands.

But maybe I’m in the unreasonable one.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

People wondering what Chrome has to do with a search monopoly:

The obvious benefit is that they can default the user's search provider to Google.

But the more nefarious benefit is that, by controlling both the client and server, they can unilaterally decide the future of web standards. They don't have to advocate for proposals, gain consensus, and limit themselves to well-supported standards the way other companies do. They can just do it, gain the first-mover advantage, and force others to follow suit.

If they don't like HTTP/2, they can invent their own protocol and implement it for their search servers and Chrome. Suddenly, using Chrome with Google Search is way faster than using Chrome with Bing or using Firefox with Google Search. Even if Microsoft and Mozilla don't like the protocol, they now have to adopt it or fall behind.

This has happened. QUIC was deployed in 2012. Firefox gained support in 2021.

They're doing the same thing with Privacy Sandbox, and you can also look at browser feature compatibility tables to see how eager Google is to force their own interpretation of every not-yet-finalized web standard as the canonical interpretation.

Edit: Also, JPEG XL vs. WebP.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago

FTC works. For now.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 138 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

Lemmy does not understand that people are leaving X cuz of Nazis, not cuz it’s a centralized corpo platform.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Some are just opportunists, but there are certainly true believers — either in specific technologies, or pedal-to-the-metal growth as the only rational solution to the world’s problems.

Andreessen is pretty open about it: https://a16z.com/the-techno-optimist-manifesto/

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 4 points 2 weeks ago

And Lina Khan will be right there!

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 20 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I thought that was the free space.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 101 points 1 month ago (7 children)

He and Trump deserve each other.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

They're all towers. But the buttons are all pretty shallow with very light actuation force required.

And they all happen to be situated such that the corner which has the button is the corner furthest away from the desk, so when she jumps up onto the PC as a platform to get ready to jump onto the desk, her feet are all grouped up right in that corner.

And you can imagine that if she's crouched down ready to jump, and I put my arm out to prevent her from jumping from the tower to the desk, that's a lot of pressure all applied to her little toe beans.

It's an unfortunate coincidence. But that experience, together with seeing this Mac Mini design, has made me wonder why we tend to put a button with such drastic effects right out in the open like this.

view more: next ›