this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
201 points (90.0% liked)

Technology

70362 readers
3835 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
201
I just came across an AI called Sesame that appears to have been explicitly trained to deny and lie about the Palestinian genocide (app.sesame.com)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by destructdisc@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/30173090

The AIs at Sesame are able to hold eloquent and free-flowing conversations about just about anything, but the second you mention the Palestinian genocide they become very evasive, offering generic platitudes about "it's complicated" and "pain on all sides" and "nuance is required", and refusing to confirm anything that seems to hold Israel at fault for the genocide -- even publicly available information "can't be verified", according to Sesame.

It also seems to block users from saving conversations that pertain specifically to Palestine, but everything else seems A-OK to save and review.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] medem@lemmy.wtf 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's...silly

[โ€“] T156@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Not really. Why censor more than you have to? That takes time and effort, and it's almost certainly easier to do it using something else. The law isn't that particular, as long as you follow it.

You also don't risk causing the model to go wrong, like trying to censor bits of the model has a habit of doing.