this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
2 points (57.1% liked)
Memes
51301 readers
966 users here now
Rules:
- Be civil and nice.
- Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No, you can't just rewrite the definition of democracy and take out all the key parts just so you can apply it to China and try and washing over all their flaws.
Didnt the CCP weld people into their homes during covid. People have no human rights to the CCP. They are just tools to be used to further the parties goals.
Fine I'll ask myself "why do Chinese citizens overwhelmingly approve of their government, and feel that they have genuine democratic input despite having a different democratic model than my own?"
Probably because their government dominates every part of their life. Constantly propagandises them and viciously cracks down on any dissent. They also have been having a ton of economic growth which usually results in favour for the party in power.
They think they have democracy because they have been mislead to what democracy is and theyve been told they have it "its not authoritarianism its just democracy with Chinese characteristics" and those characteristics are stripping all rights and power from the populous.
Interestingly, not even the ancient greeks would consider what modern-day western states are, as democracies. Both Aristotle and Plato considered any system based on elections to be undemocratic oligarchies, since only the wealthy have the money to finance campaigns or the prestige to win the popularity contest.
They rightly considered democracy as meaning rule by the poor, which is the opposite of modern day bourgeois democracy.
This is a childish response. Democracy is not simply limited to "choosing the party in power." China ticks all the boxes of democracy even in the Wikipedia article on democracy, elections are held for representatives and policy is guided by what the people themselves want. Here's a good article comparing the US system with the PRC's system.
Furthermore, you just assert without basis that the people of China "have no rights" and that they are "constantly repressed," repeating verbatim US State Department talking points without genuinely engaging with Chinese people and how they view their system. You even contradict yourself, you say that Chinese people support their system because it works for them, but also that they are scared of it and in constant fear, yet support it anyways. It's a non-falsifiable orthodoxy describwd by Michael Parenti, in Blackshirts and Reds,: