this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
734 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Because Boeing were on such a good streak already...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Isn't Boeing QA supposed to inspect the plane and sign it off after maintenance?

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, they make the guides but don’t monitor them, which would be too costly (so much employees needed) and bureaucratic

[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I thought that there were specific "critical" operations that would require them (Delta, Boeing, or both) to record an entry in Boeing's Collaborative Manufacturing Execution Systems (CMES) database. But I'm discovering this field, so I don't know if they make a difference in this context between before and after delivery, and if the normal plane maintenance is covered by the same processes or not, and that's why I'm asking, and not stating.

However, if one doesn't know more than me, stating isn't more correct.

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well, they probably register repairs in databases, but they definitely don’t send people to check every single thing. Airlines also might contract Boeing to do some bigger repairs.

[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't see how a repair that causes the nose of a plane to "fall off" would not be considered a "bigger repair"...

I'm not saying that Boeing would be involved in the replacement of a tire from the landing gear. But something major enough to make the actual nose of the plane to literally fall off? That sounds important enough to me.

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The wheel near the nose fell off, not the nose itself smh

[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

OK I'm officially too tired to actually contribute to Lemmy. I'll be on my way... 😭

[–] athos77@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] Flag@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Required by law? I dunno, im guessing here.

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

How many Boeing planes are out there vs number of employees?

[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago

Because of regulations, because of contracts, because of a myriad reasons I won't waste my time listing here.

The point is that they have been in business for over a century, that the aerospace industry is heavily regulated, and so I somewhat expect them to have processes in place and responsibilities to make sure the planes are delivered and remain according to their design specification.

And you don't strike me as someone who knows more than me (a total newbie) on the matter, so maybe we stop wasting each other's time on a pointless argument about shit that is absolutely beyond us both. Yeah?