this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
78 points (91.5% liked)

Games

19864 readers
625 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
78
Debunking the grey market beyond Steam (www.gamesindustry.biz)
submitted 5 days ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/games@sh.itjust.works
178 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Despite facing increased competition in the space, not least from the Epic Games Store, Valve's platform is synonymous with PC gaming. The service is estimated to have made $10.8 billion in revenue during 2024, a new record for the Half-Life giant. Since it entered the PC distribution space back in 2018, the rival Epic Games Store has been making headway – and $1.09 billion last year – but Steam is still undeniably dominant within the space.

Valve earns a large part of its money from taking a 20-30% cut of sales revenue from developers and publishers. Despite other storefronts opening with lower overheads, Steam has stuck with taking this slice of sales revenue, and in doing so, it has been argued that Valve is unfairly taking a decent chunk of the profits of developers and publishers.

This might change, depending on how an ongoing class-action lawsuit initiated by Wolfire Games goes, but for the time being, Valve is making money hand over fist selling games on Steam. The platform boasts over 132 million users, so it's perfectly reasonable that developers and publishers feel they have to use Steam – and give away a slice of their revenue – in order to reach the largest audience possible.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Your first comment in this chain that I am responding to is

Excuse my frank speech but that's absolute bollocks and lacks any understanding at all of how a monopoly works.

Which is not a definition and thus why I am asking. You have not yet defined it yet seem insistent that it is.

And a whataboutism is when you bring up a parallel or comparable topic in an attempt to shift it. You brought up google in a discussion about Steam/Valve. That very much is.

Having a large user base is not a monopoly. Hershey doesn't have a monopoly on chocolate for being the popular choice. People can and will at any time use competing products.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Your first comment in this chain that I am responding to is

I remember, thanks.

You have not yet defined it yet seem insistent that it is.

You didn't ask me for a definition.

And a whataboutism is

I know what a whataboutism is. You dont. This is called an "example". An example of a company that was legally ruled a monopoly but also has competition.

You brought up google in a discussion about Steam/Valve.

You're missing the larger discussion around monopolies, and you're mad because I disproved your position. You also didn't answer my question while simultaneously repeatedly demanding that I answer yours.

Having a large user base is not a monopoly.

You're obviously just misrepresenting the statement I just made in the comment you just replied to.

I think it's pretty clear at this point that you have no intention of a good faith discussion so I'm not going to entertain this any further.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 3 points 3 days ago

You didn't answer the questions and said you did then turn and said it was my fault for not agreeing with you.

You didn't state how they are a monopoly you just wanted the agreement. You didn't state how your comparison related just figured it would be obvious.

You are being a hypocrite and stating your actions on me for asking follow ups.

Do not blame me for not being able to converse when you are the one refusing to participate in a meaningful way.
You are upset that a platform is popular. That is the text of your argument as it is read. Change your argument if you aren't getting your point across. This is just deflection to protect your own conceptions.

Try to actually disprove people next time instead of saying it's their fault for not understanding and leaving. It doesn't do anything other than waste your time.