this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
8 points (61.8% liked)

Technology

72769 readers
1390 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
8
Artificial intelligence and the wellbeing of workers: no evidence of a sizeable negative impact of AI on workers’ well-being and mental health. (www.nature.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by Pro@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

We find no evidence of a sizeable negative impact of AI on workers’ well-being and mental health. If anything, there is evidence of an improvement in health status and health satisfaction, which may be explained by the decline in job physical intensity. Overall, our results are consistent with the lack of negative effects of AI on the labor markets.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

This study explores the relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) and workers’ well-being and health using longitudinal survey data from Germany (2000–2020).

It's crazy the AI bros will say that this means AI is safe...

But then ask them how much AI has improved since 2020 and without a shred of realization they'll tell you only an idiot would compare 2020 AI to 2025 AI...

Like, it's not the study's fault. It's the fault of anyone trying to apply it to modern AI.