this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
45 points (89.5% liked)

Games

16812 readers
519 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
45
The Pokemon Company releases a statement regarding Palworld: Inquiries Regarding Other Companies’ Games (corporate.pokemon.co.jp)
submitted 10 months ago by hal_5700X@lemmy.world to c/games@sh.itjust.works
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Here’s a archive link, https://archive.ph/oT1L6

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hal_5700X@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (18 children)

I don’t see Nintendo/Game Freak doing something about Palword. Due to Palworld's first trailer release two years ago. So if Nintendo/Game Freak was going to do something about Palworld. They had two years to do it.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 31 points 10 months ago (17 children)

They can only demand palworld to not advertise it as "pokemon with gun", otherwise they have no case against the uninspired monster design.

[–] Koen967@feddit.nl 13 points 10 months ago (5 children)

I wonder. Does that also mean Fromsoft has a case against games marketing themselves as soulslikes?

[–] AdmiralShat@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Can you imagine the ego stroking it must be to have an entire genre named after your work?

They probably could have had a case against the first game to market itself as such, but I think once the terminology gets utilized as a "common term", you can't do anything. It's why Nintendo in the 80s and 90s was so fucking adamant on pushing parents away from calling any and every home game console a Nintendo

Fromsoft would have 0 ground if they wanted to today, but honestly, again, I think it's one of those things thats such a pedestal that there would be no reason to go after it.

[–] 520@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Imagine what the developers of Rogue must feel. Games in that vein are still called Rogue-likes 43 years later

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)