this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
45 points (89.5% liked)

Games

16785 readers
847 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Here’s a archive link, https://archive.ph/oT1L6

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hal_5700X@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I don’t see Nintendo/Game Freak doing something about Palword. Due to Palworld's first trailer release two years ago. So if Nintendo/Game Freak was going to do something about Palworld. They had two years to do it.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 31 points 10 months ago (4 children)

They can only demand palworld to not advertise it as "pokemon with gun", otherwise they have no case against the uninspired monster design.

[–] WeLoveCastingSpellz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

pokemon doesn't own the concept of monster colectors

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The accusation isn't about the concept but the artwork.

[–] 520@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Pokémon doesn't own the concept of cute magical anime animals either. Infact I'm pretty sure it's a common anime trope.

If they could do shit about this, Digimon and Yokai Watch would not exist.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc -1 points 10 months ago

Never said they did.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Pokemon doesn't own the idea of bad drawing either.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not sure where that come from but okay.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world -5 points 10 months ago

Sent with my Samsung Note 20 ultra 5G.

[–] Koen967@feddit.nl 13 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I wonder. Does that also mean Fromsoft has a case against games marketing themselves as soulslikes?

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 11 points 10 months ago

They can try, nintendo never did, doubt they will win, and cost them the decades of good will they've gained. The genre name is either a part of the title mixed with the word clone, like, lite, or a portmanteau like Metroidvania, so it's not 100% case.

That's why Palworld did not mentioned Pokemon on the steam page and the trailer.

[–] morbidcactus@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Don't give Nintendo or Konami ideas about Metroidvanias...

Jokes aside, IMO its a common term and like has been a thing for a long time, roguelike as an example

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

It's also good for business. If someone comes in not knowing about Souls games and starts seeing it, they'll wonder why it's called that.

I played both Metroid and Castlevania when I was a kid so I knew where those came from. I quit gaming for a decade or so and didn't know anything about Souls-like games when I got back. I started seeing it everywhere and it made me curious. Now I'm a fan of From and games like what they put out.

[–] AdmiralShat@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Can you imagine the ego stroking it must be to have an entire genre named after your work?

They probably could have had a case against the first game to market itself as such, but I think once the terminology gets utilized as a "common term", you can't do anything. It's why Nintendo in the 80s and 90s was so fucking adamant on pushing parents away from calling any and every home game console a Nintendo

Fromsoft would have 0 ground if they wanted to today, but honestly, again, I think it's one of those things thats such a pedestal that there would be no reason to go after it.

[–] 520@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Imagine what the developers of Rogue must feel. Games in that vein are still called Rogue-likes 43 years later

[–] neuropean@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

It’s hard to feel any sympathy for them since they pretty much copied Pokémon another, older game.

https://sopuli.xyz/pictrs/image/b8ec9f1d-069e-4c81-b7c3-52ff6d531e98.webp

corporate talk 💀

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I've seen pictures over the last few days and just assumed a lot of the random "pals" were pokemon from the new generations.

Looks entertaining though

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is it the best survival game ever? No

Is it really fun if you like those sorts of games? For sure. My friends and I are having a blast.

The worst thing I can say about it is that it feels almost useless to build structures. I made a 2x2 house in my base and it's a waste of space. Maybe it'll matter more when we're level 50 but now....just put your bed on a foundation and give it a roof

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You give it a roof? Only player bed needs one...

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I was talking about the player bed