this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
573 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
3366 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 213 points 10 months ago (6 children)

It is worth understanding that this is "different" than... all the other layoffs in tech at this point.

MS acquired ABK. Any acquisition almost always leads to "downsizing". At a high level: ABK would have had their own payroll department. Now they go through MS payroll. Why do you need an entire department whose job is now superfluous? Obviously this gets a LOT more complex with developers and the like (as well as local management) but that is the mindset.

But... holy fucking shit that is a lot of people getting laid off at one of the worst times to be unemployed in "tech" in the past decade.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 64 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It is indeed a lot of people. A quick search says ABK employed 17,000 people. Laying over over 10% of your workforce is... intense, to say the least. Though, how much of that 1,900 is just from ABK is hard to say, so the percentage could be lower.

You're right though; HR, payroll, legal, and social media/PR departments would definitely be among the first on the chopping block, depending on how much MS wants to integrate ABK into their existing departments.

[–] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 43 points 10 months ago

Finance too. They're almost always first from the multiple I've personally been through. The new owners want those hands out of the pot asap.

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 40 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Also considering the apparent toxicity of certain Blizzard employees it's probably a good opportunity to "purge" the Kotic gang and his following.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

So that's a dozen people. 1900 is more than a hundred times that. (#mathFTW)

These cuts will seriously hurt product.

Also, I sense my less-than-new windows version will be unsupported; and I only had it so the one game ran better.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Blizzard Products were polished turds.

They need a huge cultural shift and I'm all for it.

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Oh it's ok since competition is getting killed too. See you soon at the bottom of the barrel.

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hence why acquisitions need more scrutiny. It literally kills jobs.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

In this case, it kills unproductive jobs. Payroll people are necessary but at the end of the day, they don't produce anything you would want to buy. This means that if you keep more administrative jobds than you need, there will be fewer actuall things to go around. Hence everyone will be poorer on average (or realistically speaking, the rich will be poorer in the current system, but that is a different issue).

Anyway, keeping unproductive jobds to reduce unenployment is a dumb idea and is one of the main reason why communism sucked so much.

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I have a better idea. Fire the whole payroll division and hire just one accountant. Since clearly, clearly, any number of payroll employees can sustain any company size, this is the most cost efficient way to go.

Oh you say one staff in payroll is not enough? Oh then I miss your point.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

How about you take your strawman argument somewhere else? I never said you need just one. But the company clearly did not need as many, if they were able to let them go. Economy of scale I guess.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, it’s brutal out there right now. Reminds me of 2008 or 2000.

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Similar to 2008 but the 1% found out a way to keep their wealth intact while still fucking everyone else over.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

In 2008, those responsible got the rest of us to bail them out and give billions in bonuses.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

There should be some sort of law that hits exec’s options, RSUs and bonuses if their financial for a business division aren’t total trash. Example, eBay, which grew and still laid people off.

That said, this one I kind of get. Mergers and acquisitions create literal redundancies. You end up with duplicates of people and departments.

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Corporate can't see the difference

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm a bit skeptical that this is just about "downsizing" or eliminating redundant positions after the acquisition. Based on what I've seen on Twitter, a lot of junior, middle, and senior level positions were victims of these cuts, across a ton of different departments. Animators, artists, developers, no one was safe. Apparently like the entire Overwatch lore team was cut - you can't tell me that team has any overlap whatsoever with any existing Microsoft employees.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That gets into the mess of what the reality of "gaming" is. Most people will acknowledge that Call of Duty and... uhm... Halo? Sure, let's go with that. CoD and Halo compete. They are both games in a similar genre. Same with the hilarity of Horizon Zero Dawn meaning that a critically acclaimed open world game is coming out.

But the reality is that CoD and Fortnite compete with Squid Game and Reacher. Breath of the Wild competes with both Elden Ring AND The World Cup. The resource is increasingly time. When people get home from work they generally aren't saying "I am going to play three hours of video games and it will either be Battlebit or CoD". They are saying "I have three hours so maybe I'll watch an episode or two of Demon Slayer or I could do my dailies in Fifa?"

And, in that regard, Overwatch is an increasingly "failed" live service game with an IP that has lots almost all of its good will. Whereas Halo... Master Chief had a sweet ass? But Overwatch DOES compete with the other big live game that MS acquired alongside them... Call of Duty. And so forth.

Its all a giant mess where labor suffers. But... yeah.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world -4 points 10 months ago

This is GOOD for bitcoin!